Quick Glance at Head and Shoulders Pattern Statistics

Need Money? Join Lending Club!

Remember, this blog is like a whiteboard - we are kind of brainstorming here…

I am beginning to play around with quantifying the predictability of patterns, such as the head and shoulders pattern. There is a lot of analysis, running of data and thinking that needs to be done, but I wanted to talk a little about what I am seeing so far. To really understand the usability of certain patterns, you really need to slice and dice the data in various ways to understand what tendency the market/stock/index/whatever might have after a pattern presents itself. As an experiment, I pulled closing data from about a thousand stocks that I had over 10 years worth of data. Presently, I am just trying to get a handle on the H&S pattern across ALL stocks, so I figured I would ignore individual stocks and just look at some global numbers.

I decided to be very simplistic (and practical) and look at the seven day H&S pattern. I am making a HUGE assumption in this next step - I am assuming the general tendency of the pattern will play out within seven days (again, seven to match the length of the pattern). In the future, I plan on looking at days one through pattern length X 2 - or something of that nature - to give use a better understanding of how a pattern evolves once it is recognizable. So, here are some early numbers:

- The average stock showed a 7 period head and shoulders pattern every 349 trading days
- That equates to about .4% of all stocks having a head and shoulders of length 7 at any one time

Okay, those make sense. It seems that patterns like this are relatively rare.

- It seems that only about 400 stocks out of 1000 had a tendency to move DOWN seven days after an H&S pattern

Ooops…

The “head-and-shoulders” pattern is believed to be one of the most reliable trend-reversal patterns.

Okay, let’s dig just a little here:

- Of the 400 odd stocks that showed a tendency to go down after an H&S pattern, the average seven day loss was 1.7%
- Of the 600 remaining stocks that showed a tendency to go UP after an H&S pattern, the average seven day gain was 2.45%

Okay, that is just a little taste. I have plenty of work ahead of me to really see what is going on. Also, if anyone sees any problems in my logic or has questions about how I am calculating things - let me know. I am skipping a lot for ease on my part and trying to get to the deeper issues, but details can be important and that is where the mistakes can be made!

5 Responses to “Quick Glance at Head and Shoulders Pattern Statistics”

  1. If there is no preceding trend, then why should we expect a trend reversal? If you are looking for price declines after the head and shoulders pattern completes, you need to identify the conditions where the stock has a preceding uptrend on the same timeframe as your h&s pattern. It would be interesting to see how that changes your results.

    I surfed in here from Michael Taylor’s blog a few days ago. I like your blog and look forward to visiting it regularly.

  2. Administrator on March 31st, 2006 at 9:02 pm

    Jon - thanks for pointing that out. I was under the impression that H&S patterns were Bearish, not just a “trend-reversal”. I found that quote on Investopedia -> http://www.investopedia.com/terms/h/head-shoulders.asp as I was writting up the notes. Hmmmm… Now I am confused, but your point is right on target. As part of a more comprehensive study, I can look at the trend before the H&S. But more importantly, I need to figure out the “accepted” view of what H&S is predicting.

  3. For the purposes of head and shoulders analysis, I recommend we define a prior uptrend as a series of higher highs and higher lows (you can identify this with correlation too). A head and shoulders will have taken place any time there is one of these uptrends that turns into a downtrend (lower highs and lower lows). Draw with a pencil on paper a zig-zag up line followed by a zig-zag down line without taking your pencil off the paper– you will see a head & shoulders at the top. It becomes much more clear if you zig-zag like 10 higher highs and higher lows, followed by 10 lower highs and lower lows to make a mountain shaped drawing. As far as I know, that is the “accepted” view, although in practice it is always a lot more messy.

  4. Dear friend
    I’m very happy for visiting your blog. I have a blog on mathematics which publish it in 2 language. I want to visit my blog and send your comment about it.
    I have a question. May you link us http://mathcom.blogfa.com

  5. [...] Dang it - I messed up that last experiment in looking at head and shoulders, so we will re-do it to see what difference it makes. Thanks for pointing out my, uh, ignorance! [...]

Leave a Reply